Agenda for the Meeting with the Councillors of the Culverden Ward, Tunbridge Wells
at the Conservative Party House, 84 London Road, Tunbridge Wells, Wednesday 4th October 2000 at 18:30
To the meeting came Cllr. Len Price, Cllr. David Wakefield, Cllr. Kevin Lynes. Local residents from York Road, Church Road and Inner London Road turned up to make the councillors aware of the unsuitability of the proposed planning.
But when the burglar alarm went off at the Conservative Party House, the councillors decided that the meeting could not take place as planned. Cllr. Wakefield invited the residents to his house, the historic Jordan House at the corner of Church Road / London Road. Cllr. Len Price could not attend as he had hoped prior to the incident at the Party House.
The Agenda could not be followed to the points, but Cllr. Wakefield
confirmed his symphathetic view to the objections of the residents and seemed
astonished that the developer did 'breach' governmental guidelines with regard to density.
Residents believe that all grounds for refusal of the first planning application of 27th January 2000 are still applicable.
Development of Telephone House site (Church Road / York Road) in the town centre of Tunbridge Wells
Concerns:
Residents are afraid that " bulk, size and height of the existing office building " will not be reduced by the proposed planning.
- The density seeked by the developer is extremely high
Government guidelines are 30-50 per hectare.
The site is only 0.307 hectare (0.76 acres)
43 units on this land mean 140 ! units per hectare
Making the calculation at the higher limit of 50 per hectare, the developer would have to be satisfied with 16 units.
-The proposed 43 flats could provide accommodation for 2/3 of York Roads actual population. (prices for the new development at BP 250.000)
Summary of objections and suggestions:
- * Density
- Density within the governmental guidelines 30-50 per hectare would solve many problems
- * Traffic
- Increased volume of traffic
- Pollution & congestion
- All access via York Road
- All traffic directed into town centre
- Road maintenance
- Road safety (result of more on street parking, increased use)
- Traffic studies carried out ?
- * Parking
- Only one space per flat
- Already over crowded and much illegal parking in York Road
- Public safety issues : foot path blocked
- Fire Services & Ambulance access ?
- Parking survey ? - only 40 car spaces exist in York Road
- Will residents be able to apply for parking permits in York Road
- * Sky line
- York Road: higher than houses directly opposite
- (height of buildings takes the light off - ancient light issue)
- Church Road: far higher than immediate neighbours
- Completely obliterates views from London Road and York Road (upper end)
towards Trinity Church
- * Habitat
- Buildings not set back enough,
- no front garden
- Housing Block D has a ramp onto the pavement
- Privacy issue: neighbourhood watch in the most negative way
- Destroying the existing trees
- No proper replacement for this - internal courtyard shrubs do not
benefit the public
- Tunbridge Wells in Bloom
- * Demolition
- Asbestos survey
- Water spraying the site
- ~ 1000 lorries with spoil, where will they go ?
- * Construction
- Traffic via York Road too heavy
- Street too narrow built
- Double parking frequent
- Illegal parking on yellow line / pavement
- No passage for lorries - blocking the road
- More logical via Church Road
- Road maintenance
- Structural damage to properties
- Likely vehicle damage
- * Services
- Guarantee of mains services coping ?
- Expanding of mains
- Irregular usage from office in the past - not residential
- 43 flats = considerable strain on water electricity gas sewerage
- * Suitability
- No benefits to present York Road residents
- Out of line & unrelated to existing York Road buildings (e.g. rendered facades - Block D is planned with bricks)
- Diverse supply of housing : Housing Association v. Penthouses
- Density down under 24 units: No legislation for affordable housing.
- Housing at cost of amenity (neglected amenity & leisure areas)
- No play areas for children
- Opportunity to correct the predecessors error:
- The new design needs to be congruent with existing buildings in the neighbourhood of Church and York Road:
- Why not reflect the architecture of Decimus Burton?
- Retirement homes could be a more suitable project, provided that density and amenity are respected.
The Councillors of the Culverden Ward, Tunbridge Wells
|
The re-development of the Telephone House, York Road / Church Road, Tunbridge Wells
|